The stunning acquittal of Casey Anthony on the most serious charges in the slaying of her 2-year-old daughter has invited comparisons to the outcome of O.J. Simpson’s double-murder trial in 1995.
Those comparisons are mostly misleading.
Simpson was found not guilty in October 1995 of the stabbing deaths of his former wife, Nicole, and her friend, Ron Goldman.
“Word of the verdict spread like wildfire … making a return to a normal life for newly-famous Anthony as unlikely as it was for already-famous Simpson 16 years ago.”
The blog also declared:
“Just as some greeted the Simpson verdict with tears and disbelief, there was much the same reaction about the Anthony verdict, including other mothers and daughters who railed against the verdict on the courthouse steps.
“Unlike OJ, who was accused of stabbing his [former] wife and one of her friends to death in a fit of jealous rage, there didn’t seem to be even the smallest cheering section for Anthony. Then again she was accused of murdering her two-year-old daughter, whose skeletal remains were found near the family home with duct tape dangling from her skull.
“Anthony’s defense was considerably less adamant than Simpson’s ‘100% not guilty’ plea, but, like Simpson, she did not take the stand in her own defense.”
While interesting, the parallels are mostly superficial and unrevealing.
The Anthony proceedings in Florida hardly were in the league of the O.J. trial in Los Angeles.
Casey Anthony, unlike Simpson, was no national celebrity before she was tried on charges of killing her daughter, Caylee.
As Marcia Clark, the prosecutor who lost the Simpson trial, said of Anthony:
“She never wowed the nation with her athletic prowess, shilled in countless car commercials, or entertained in film comedies.” Simpson had been a star football player, a pitchman for the Hertz car rental company, and a supporting actor in movies such as The Naked Gun.
Race — a central, defining factor in Simpson’s trial — was absent in the Anthony trial.
As such, the verdict in her case, surprising though it was, prompted nothing akin to the divisive, clashing reactions that greeted Simpson’s acquittal: Many whites reacted with shock and disbelief while many blacks cheered the outcome.
Significantly, the Anthony case produced nothing akin to the moment at the end of the Simpson trial, when the country held its collective breath and awaited the verdicts.
The Simpson jury deliberated less than four hours before deciding the case on October 2, 1995. The hapless judge who presided over the 134-day trial, Lance Ito, announced that the verdicts would be read the following day, at 10 a.m. Pacific time, 1 p.m. Eastern.
As that hour approached on October 3, 1995, the country seemed almost to shut down. The New York Times reported that for 10 minutes, from 1 p.m. to 1:10 p.m. Eastern, “people didn’t work. They didn’t go to math class. They didn’t make phone calls. They didn’t use the bathroom. They didn’t walk the dog.
“They listened to the O.J. Simpson verdicts,” in what the newspaper accurately called “an eerie moment of national communion, in which the routines and rituals of the country were subsumed by an unquenchable curiosity.
“Millions of people in millions of places seemed to spend 10 spellbinding minutes doing exactly the same thing.”
Those minutes represented an exceptional occasion of collective anticipation, an almost incomparable moment.
For the collective anticipation they generated, the final moments in the Simpson case were rivaled perhaps only by the first manned lunar landing in July 1969.
Recent and related:
- Newspapers vital to democracy? Where’s the proof?
- Why history is badly taught, poorly learned
- WaPo commentary off-target on ‘sexual misbehavior of prominent men’
- 1897 flashback: Committing ‘jailbreak journalism’
- ‘Kill the Irishman’: Glamorizing ’70s Cleveland underworld?
- ‘A debunker’s work is never done’
- ‘Getting It Wrong’ goes on Q-and-A