It is a little-recognized, never-celebrated anniversary in American journalism, granted.
But tomorrow marks 114 years since the term “yellow journalism” first appeared in print, in the old New York Press, edited by the austere Ervin Wardman (left).
The phrase “the Yellow Journalism” appeared in a small headline on the editorial page of the Press on January 31, 1897. The phrase also appeared that day in the newspaper’s editorial page gossip column, “On the Tip of the Tongue.”
“Yellow journalism” quickly caught on, as a sneer to denigrate what then was called the “new journalism” of the New York Journal of William Randolph Hearst and the New York World of Joseph Pulitzer. By the end of March 1897, references to “yellow journalism” had appeared in newspapers in Providence, Richmond, and San Francisco.
In the decades since then, “yellow journalism” has become a widely popular if nebulous term — derisive shorthand for vaguely denouncing sensationalism and journalistic misconduct of all kinds, real and imagined.
“It is,” as I noted in my 2001 book Yellow Journalism: Puncturing the Myths, Defining the Legacies, “an evocative term that has been diffused internationally, in contexts as diverse as Greece and Nigeria, as Israel and India.”
Precisely how Wardman and the Press landed on the phrase “yellow journalism” isn’t clear.
The newspaper’s own, brief discussion of the term’s derivation was unhelpful and unrevealing: “We called them Yellow because they are Yellow,” it said in 1898 about the Journal and the World.
In the 1890s, the color yellow sometimes was associated with decadent literature, which may have been an inspiration to the Harvard-educated Wardman, a figure now largely lost to New York newspaper history.
Wardman was tall and stern-looking. He once was described as showing his “Calvinistic ancestry in every line of his face.” He did little to conceal his contempt for Hearst and Hearst’s journalism.
His disdain was readily apparent in the columns of the Press, of which Wardman became editor in chief in 1896 at the age of 31. (The Press is long defunct; it is not to be confused with the contemporary alternative weekly of the same title.)
Wardman’s Press took to taunting Hearst, Hearst’s mother, and Hearst’s support for Democratic candidate William Jennings Bryan in the 1896 presidential election. The New York Journal was virtually alone among New York newspapers in supporting Bryan’s “free silver” candidacy.
The Press disparaged Hearst, then 34, as a mama’s boy, as “Billy” and “little Willie.” It referred to the Journal as “our silverite, or silver-wrong, contemporary.”
The Press also experimented with pithy blasts on the editorial page to denounce “new journalism.”
“The ‘new journalism,’” the Press said in early January 1897 “continues to think up a varied assortment of new lies.”
Later in the month, the Press asked in a single-line editorial comment:
“Why not call it nude journalism?”
It clearly was a play on “new journalism” and meant to suggest the absence of “even the veneer of decency.”
Before long, Wardman and the Press seized upon the phrase “yellow-kid journalism,” which evoked the Hearst-Pulitzer rivalry over a popular cartoon character known as the “Yellow Kid.”
Both the Journal and the World at the time were publishing versions of the kid.
At the end of January 1897, the phrase “yellow-kid journalism” was modified to “the Yellow Journalism,” and the sneer was born.
After landing on that evocative pejorative, Wardman turned to it often, invoking the term in brief editorial comments and asides such as: “The Yellow Journalism is now so overripe that the little insects which light upon it quickly turn yellow, too.”
“… the sun in heaven is yellow—the sun which is to this earth what the Journal is to American journalism.”
Recent and related:
- New York Times practices ‘yellow journalism’? How so?
- The ‘anniversary’ of a media myth: ‘I’ll furnish the war’
- Two myths and today’s New York Times
- NYTimes flubs the correction
- Fact-checking Keller on NYT-Bay of Pigs suppression myth
- On the thin contribution of media rabble-rousers
- Obama, journalism history, and ‘folks like Hearst’
- Some snarky history from WaPo
- Blaming assassination on political rhetoric: No new tactic
- Media myths, the ‘junk food of journalism’
- ‘Persuasive and entertaining’: WSJ reviews ‘Getting It Wrong’