W. Joseph Campbell

Recalling the mythical ‘Cronkite Moment’

In Cronkite Moment, Debunking, Media myths on February 26, 2010 at 6:09 am

Tomorrow is the anniversary of the so-called “Cronkite Moment,” which is widely believed to have been an exceptionally powerful and decisive moment in American journalism.

The “Cronkite Moment” occurred February 27, 1968, when CBS News Anchor Walter Cronkite declared on air that the U.S. war effort in Vietnam was mired in stalemate and suggested negotiations as a way to extricate the country from the conflict.

At the White House that night, President Lyndon Johnson supposedly watched the Cronkite program, a special report about Vietnam in the aftermath of the surprise Tet offensive. Upon hearing Cronkite’s pessimistic assessment, Johnson is said to have snapped off the television set and muttered to an aide, or aides:

“If I’ve lost Cronkite, I’ve lost Middle America.”

Or words to that effect.

With Cronkite having turned against the war, the Johnson White House supposedly reeled. And at the end of March 1968, the president announced he would not seek reelection.

It is one of the great stories American journalism tells about itself, a moment when the power of television was trained on foreign policy to make a difference in an unpopular and faraway war.

More accurately, though, it’s one of American journalism’s most enduring and appealing media-driven myths.

As I’ve noted on a number of occasions at Media Myth Alert, and as I write in Getting It Wrong, my forthcoming book on media-driven myths,  Johnson did not watch the Cronkite program on Vietnam when it aired that night 42 years ago.

The president that night was in Austin, Texas, at the 51st birthday party of a political ally, Governor John Connally.

About the time Cronkite intoned his downbeat, “mired in stalemate” assessment, Johnson was offering light-hearted banter about Connally’s age, saying:

Johnson in Texas, February 27, 1968

“Today you are 51, John. That is the magic number that every man of politics prays for—a simple majority. Throughout the years we have worked long and hard—and I might say late—trying to maintain it, too.”

Earlier in the day, Johnson had delivered a rousing speech in Dallas, in which he characterized the U.S. war effort in Churchillian terms.

“There will be blood, sweat and tears shed,” he said, adding:  “I do not believe that America will ever buckle” in pursuit of its objectives in Vietnam.

Even if the president had seen the Cronkite program, it is difficult to imagine how his opinion could have swung so abruptly, from a vigorous defense of the war effort to resignation and despair.

Casting further doubt on the “Cronkite Moment” is uncertainty about what, exactly, Johnson supposedly said in reaction to Cronkite’s editorial comments about the war.

The most common version has him saying: “If I’ve lost Cronkite, I’ve lost Middle America.”

But another version is: “I’ve lost Cronkite, I’ve lost the country.”

Yet another version has it this way: “If I’ve lost Cronkite, I’ve lost the American people.”

Still another version is: “If I’ve lost Cronkite, I’ve lost the war.”

And another goes: “If we lose Cronkite, we lose America.”

And, unaccountably: “If I’ve lost Cronkite, I’ve lost the middle west.”

Version variability of  such magnitude signals implausibility.

So why, 42 years on, does it matter whether the “Cronkite Moment” is a myth?

As I write in Getting It Wrong, “Seldom, if ever, do the news media exert truly decisive influences in decisions to go to war or to seek negotiated peace.

“Such decisions typically are driven by forces and factors well beyond the news media’s ability to shape, alter, or significantly influence.”

And so it was with the “Cronkite Moment.”


  1. […] and in media history. The presentation inevitably invoked the notion that the Cronkite’s on-air commentary in 1968 dissuaded Lyndon Johnson from seeking reelection to the […]

  2. […] pm The Italian online site InviatoSpeciale indulges today in the legendary though dubious “Cronkite Moment” of February […]

  3. […] wasn’t in Washington when the Vietnam special was shown. He was in Austin, Texas, at the 51st birthday party of Governor John Connally–and did not see the Cronkite […]

  4. […] instead. The Washington Post no more brought down [President Richard] Nixon than Walter Cronkite swayed [President Lyndon] Johnson’s views about the war in Vietnam. Yet those and other media […]

  5. […] wide circulation of what I call the mythical “Cronkite moment” was evident in a commentary aired the other day on Vermont Public Radio, which […]

  6. […] myth of the “Cronkite moment” is an example, I said: It seems quite difficult for some […]

  7. […] story goes that Johnson at the White House watched Cronkite’s special report on Vietnam and, after […]

  8. […] Free Press offered some unusual–and refreshing–perspective about the so-called “Cronkite Moment” of 1968, when CBS anchorman Walter Cronkite declared the U.S. military was “mired in […]

  9. […] myths illustrate the yearnings inherent in the golden age fallacy as well as the so-called “Cronkite Moment” of February 1968, when CBS newsman Walter Cronkite took to the air and declared the U.S. […]

  10. […] myth is that of the “Cronkite Moment” of February 27, 1968, when the anchorman’s on-air assessment of the war in Vietnam as […]

  11. […] a striking way of describing the mythical “Cronkite Moment”: I’ve never before read that Johnson supposedly “went berserk” in response to […]

  12. […] writer on defense issues for the Washington Times. Robbins doesn’t exactly embrace the “Cronkite Moment,” but offers it instead with qualification, […]

  13. […] 27, 1968, asserted that the U.S. military effort against the communist North Vietnamese was “mired in stalemate“–not that the war was lost. And as I note in my latest book, Getting It Wrong, the […]

  14. […] tales in American journalism are as hardy as the mythical “Cronkite Moment,” that occasion in late February 1968 when an on-air commentary by CBS News anchorman Walter Cronkite […]

  15. […] a clear reference to the mythical “Cronkite Moment,” the Big Journalism commentary […]

  16. […] mythical “Cronkite Moment” is a hardy and impressively flexible […]

  17. […] so-called “Cronkite Moment” came on February 27, 1968, when CBS News anchorman said in an on-air commentary that the U.S. war […]

  18. […] Koppel embraced the mythical “Cronkite Moment” of 1968 and saluted Edward R. Murrow’s legendary report about Senator Joseph McCarthy in […]

  19. […] characterization supposedly represented a moment of such stunning clarity and insight that it forced President Lyndon Johnson to realize his war […]

  20. […] Dallas Morning News invokes the r-word in parenthetically recalling the “Cronkite Moment” in a column on the entertainment page […]

  21. […] Times invokes the Murrow-McCarthy and “Cronkite Moment” myths in suggesting that TV comedian Jon Stewart is a latter-day equivalent of Edward R. […]

  22. […] CBS anchorman declared in a televised special report on February 27, 1968, that the U.S. military was “mired in stalemate” in Vietnam. LBJ […]

  23. […] story goes that Johnson at the White House watched Cronkite’s special report on Vietnam and, after hearing […]

  24. […] Recalling the mythical ‘Cronkite Moment’ […]

  25. […] Recalling the mythical ‘Cronkite Moment’ […]

  26. […] Recalling the mythical ‘Cronkite Moment’ […]

  27. […] That’s well said, and offers revealing insight about the tenacity of such myths as the “Cronkite Moment.” […]

  28. […] So why bother calling out Matthews for casually invoking the central component of the mythical “Cronkite Moment”? […]

  29. […] Why bother calling out Matthews for casually invoking the central component of themythical “Cronkite Moment”? […]

  30. […] This is not a tendentious point, Campbell argues persuasively: Why bother calling out Matthews for casually invoking the central component of themythical “Cronkite Moment”? […]

  31. […] Walter Cronkite, “the most trusted man in America”, had his moments. The “Cronkite Moment” occurred February 27, 1968, when CBS News Anchor Walter Cronkite […]

  32. […] all so gotten so bad so fast that Vladmir Pozner has had a “Cronkite moment” on state-sponsored […]

  33. […] Gridiron dinner is not open to cameras.  Even Tom Brokaw has had enough; isn’t this almost a “Cronkite Moment” for the major media?  (Though memo to Tom: Lindsay Lohan isn’t the real problem here.  […]

  34. […] online news and commentary site Salon today invokes the mythical “Cronkite Moment” of 1968 in mulling TV comedian Jon Stewart’s obscenity-laced criticism last night about the scandals […]

  35. […] interest to Media Myth Alert; far more intriguing is the reported casual reference to a dubious and mythical tale — a tale of impressive tenacity despite a dearth of evidence to support […]

  36. […] Maureen Dowd marred an otherwise intriguing column in yesterday’s New York Times by mischaracterizing what is known as the “Cronkite Moment.” […]

  37. […] not recounted as frequently as, say, the mythical Cronkite Moment of 1968 or the dubious tale about William Randolph Hearst’s vow to “furnish the […]

  38. […] political phenomenon that is Donald Trump — and in doing so trips over the mythical “Cronkite Moment” of […]

  39. […] doing so, Noonan tripped over the mythical “Cronkite Moment” of […]

  40. […] about a failed U.S. military mission in Somalia in 1993. Bowden devotes passing reference to the mythical “Cronkite Moment” in his latest work, Hue 1968, a detailed account of the weeks-long […]

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: