Not many news organizations these days have internal critics, usually known as ombudsmen or “reader representatives.” Michael Getler, the ombudsman for PBS, is the best of them.
He’s a straightshooter, tough but fairminded.
Getler was often outstanding in five years as ombudsman at the Washington Post, notably calling out the newspaper’s botched reporting about Jessica Lynch’s mythical battlefield exploits early in the Iraq War.
Lynch was a 19-year-old Army private whom the Post catapulted to international fame in a story in April 2003 that claimed she fought fiercely in an ambush in Iraq, firing at her attackers despite being shot and stabbed and seeing comrades “die around her.” Lynch was taken prisoner, the Post, reported, only after running out of ammunition.
The electrifying story, which the Post based on otherwise unidentified “U.S. officials,” was wrong in every important detail. In his analyses, Getler was withering and incisive.
The hero-warrior story about Lynch, he wrote, “had an odor to it almost from the beginning, and other news organizations blew holes in it well before The Post did….”
Why, he asked in one of his columns, did the information in the Post’s hero-warrior story “remain unchallenged for so long?
“What were the motivations (and even the identities) of the leakers and sustainers of this myth, and why didn’t reporters dig deeper into it more quickly?” Getler asked.
Excellent questions, which the Post never has deigned to address.
In 2005, Getler became the first ombudsman at PBS, to help ensure “that PBS upholds its own rigorous standards of journalistic ethics for both online and on-air content.”
I was in touch with Getler by email weeks before PBS aired its recent turgid documentary about the famous radio dramatization in 1938 of The War of the Worlds, which told of a Martian invasion of the United States.
I described to Getler my concerns that the documentary would embrace the media myth that The War of the Worlds program set off mass panic and nationwide hysteria on the night it was aired. I also asked about how the documentary would present or characterize recent scholarship that has impugned the panic-and-hysteria interpretation.
My concerns were heightened because pre-broadcast material that PBS posted online said “perhaps a million [people] or more” were “plunged into panic, convinced that America was under a deadly Martian attack.”
Getler forwarded my queries to Mark Samels, executive producer of the PBS “American Experience” series. Soon after, Getler told me that Samels said he was “not going to respond to someone who has not seen the program.” This was seven weeks before the documentary aired.
(Getler also noted that he did not speak for PBS and has no “pre-broadcast role” at the organization.)
I subsequently sent an email directly to Samels, reiterating my concerns.
Samels never replied.
Immediately after the documentary was shown Tuesday evening, I posted a commentary at Media Myth Alert saying the program represented a squandered opportunity to revisit The War of the Worlds dramatization in a searching and educational way.
PBS, I wrote, “could have confronted head-on the question of whether the radio show … really did provoke hysteria and mass panic in the United States. That’s the conventional wisdom, and it makes for a deliciously good yarn — that Americans back then were so skittish or doltish or unaccustomed to electronic media that they readily believed the story of the lethal Martian invasion of Earth, as described in The War of the Worlds broadcast.”
But PBS failed to raise searching questions or offer revealing insight about the famous radio show; instead, it presented a tedious program that claimed upwards “of a million people” were convinced, “if only briefly, that the United States was being laid waste by alien invaders.”
No explanation was offered during the program as to how the makers of the documentary arrived at such a dubious figure.
Getler yesterday posted a thoughtful and insightful critique about the documentary. Notably, he pointed out that shortly before the program ended, “the narrator, just casually in his final summing up, includes this sentence: ‘Ultimately, the very extent of the panic would come to be seen as having been exaggerated by the press.'”
“Really!” Getler wrote. “Is that not part of the real story? Is that not worth more than a sentence at the end of an hour-long program? Could that be described by some as burying the lead?”
“Burying the lead” is journalese for failing to assign prominence to the most important information of a news report.
And he’s right: PBS buried the lead in its War of the Worlds documentary.
Getler also wrote:
“I find myself in agreement with the judgment of W. Joseph Campbell, the well-known critic and author of ‘Getting It Wrong: Ten of the Greatest Misreported Stories in American Journalism’ who headlined his comment: ‘PBS squanders opportunity to offer “content that educates” in “War of the Worlds” doc.'”
Getler’s column closed with comments — at long last — from Samels, who stated:
“Our film does not say that people panicked, nor does the script include the phrase ‘mass hysteria.'”
Ah, but the documentary invoked “chaos” to describe reactions to The War of the Worlds radio program. And as Getler noted in his critique, the documentary displayed “several banner newspaper headlines” published the day after 1938 dramatization. The effect was to suggest that the radio show had spread panic across the country.
Which assuredly it had not.
Those headlines made such declarations as:
- “Radio Listeners in Panic, Taking War Drama as Fact”
- “Radio ‘Martian Attack’ Terrorizes U.S. Hearers, Thousands in Panic”
- “Radio Fake Scares Nation”
And of course, PBS did claim in the documentary that “upwards of a million people” were convinced, if briefly, the country was under Martian attack — an estimate Samels in his comments said was taken from Hadley Cantril’s 1940 book, The Invasion From Mars.
But Cantril estimated that 1 million to 1.2 million people may have been “frightened” or “disturbed” or “excited” by what they heard. He did not exactly say those listeners were “convinced” the country was under Martian attack. And as I point out in Getting It Wrong, Cantril did not estimate how many listeners acted on their fear or excitement.
Being “frightened” or “disturbed” is hardly synonymous with being “panic-stricken.”
In any event, there are more recent and more discerning sources than Cantril’s problematic, 73-year-old book about The War of the Worlds program. But Samels and the documentary’s producer ignored those sources.
Another matter about the PBS documentary awaits Getler’s consideration.
This has to do with the program’s recreated dialog, in which actors dressed in period clothing gave voice to reactions that contemporaneous listeners of the radio program had described in letters.
One of the actors spoke the words of a “Sylvia Holmes” of Newark, New Jersey.
“Holmes” was presented in the documentary as someone deeply frightened by the radio show.
But her remarks on the PBS documentary were drawn from Cantril’s 1940 book. As media historian Michael Socolow has pointed out, Cantril did not use real names in the book. Indeed, Cantril wrote:
“All names of respondents used in the text, are fictitious and identifying characteristics are disguised, but the true flavor of the case studies is preserved.”
So “Sylvia Holmes” is a pseudonym. And in a posting at Twitter that addressed Socolow’s point, PBS seemed to say it knew that. Left unclear, though, is why the documentary presented a fictitious name as if it were real.
PBS editorial standards say that programming “content should embrace the highest commitment to excellence, professionalism, intellectual honesty and transparency. In its news and information content, accuracy should be the cornerstone.”
In offering viewers the comments of the pseudonymous “Sylvia Holmes,” PBS may have skirted its cornerstone guidance.
More from Media Myth Alert:
- PBS squanders opportunity to offer ‘content that educates’ in ‘War of the Worlds’ doc
- ‘War of the Worlds’ made boring: PBS documentary is tedious fare
- Why ‘War of the Worlds’ show didn’t panic America
- Arrogance: WaPo won’t correct dubious claim about Nixon ‘secret plan’ for Vietnam
- Lynch heroics not ‘the Pentagon’s story'; it was WaPo’s
- Why WaPo should reveal sources on bogus Jessica Lynch tale
- Where do they get this stuff?
- Getting It Wrong goes on Q-and-A