The false narrative that the Pentagon cynically concocted the tale of her battlefield derring-do in Iraq has accompanied Jessica Lynch to Idaho, where she is to deliver a speech today on the Fourth of July.
News reports in advance of Lynch’s appearance have said the Pentagon was the source of the erroneous report that she fought fiercely in an ambush in Nasiriyah in March 2003 — an engagement in which 11 American soldiers were killed.
The Post in a sensational, front-page story published April 3, 2003, said that Lynch, a 19-year-old supply clerk in the Army’s 507th Maintenance Company, had fought fiercely in the attack at Nasiriyah, suffering gunshot and stab wounds while firing round after round into the attacking Iraqis.
The Post’s article, which appeared beneath the bylines of Susan Schmidt and Vernon Loeb, was built almost entirely around anonymous sources identified only as “U.S. officials.”
One of the Schmidt-Loeb sources was quoted as saying of Lynch:
“‘She was fighting to the death. She did not want to be taken alive.’”
The article was thoroughly wrong. Bogus.
Schmidt and Loeb were misled by their sources, who to this day remain unidentified.
Lynch never fired a shot in the fighting in Nasiriyah.
She was neither shot nor stabbed.
According to her own account in a co-authored book, I Am a Soldier, Too, Lynch cowered in the back seat of a Humvee as it sped from the attack, praying, “Oh God help us. Oh God, get us out of here.”
The fleeing Humvee was struck by a rocket-propelled grenade, which sent the vehicle crashing into a disabled tractor-trailer just ahead. Lynch suffered shattering injuries; the four other soldiers in the Humvee were fatally injured.
The Post’s botched story by Schmidt and Loeb appeared two days later, beneath the headline:
“‘She was fighting to the death.’”
In its place has emerged the false narrative that the Pentagon made up the story to bolster popular support for the war.
But as I note in Getting It Wrong, the Pentagon wasn’t the Post’s source for the bogus hero-warrior tale.
“They wouldn’t say anything about Jessica Lynch,” Loeb declared.
“I just didn’t see the Pentagon trying to create a hero where there was none,” he added. “I mean …they never showed any interest in doing that, to me.”
Loeb was unequivocal in saying:
“Our sources for that story were not Pentagon sources.”
Loeb said they were “some really good intelligence sources” in Washington, D.C., and added:
“We wrote a story that turned out to be wrong because intelligence information we were given was wrong. That happens quite often.”
Loeb on another occasion was quoted in the New York Times as saying:
“Far from promoting stories about Lynch, the military didn’t like the story.”
Despite Loeb’s exculpatory comments, the erroneous interpretation that the Pentagon concocted the story about Lynch’s heroics has taken hold and lives on — in part because it corresponds well to a view that the war in Iraq was a thoroughly botched affair.
The erroneous references to the Pentagon in advance stories about Lynch’s Fourth of July talk near Craigmont, Idaho, underscore anew why the Post ought to identify the sources who led it astray on Lynch’s supposed heroics.
And after all, that’s what journalism is supposed to do.
Recent and related:
- WaPo’s latest ‘missed’ opportunity evokes Jessica Lynch case
- Recalling the hero of Nasiriyah: It wasn’t Jessica Lynch
- Why they get it wrong
- Lynch heroics not ‘the Pentagon’s story’; it was WaPo’s
- False narrative about Jessica Lynch and Pentagon surfaces anew
- Ignoring the astonishing reporting lapses in Lynch case
- Lynch says she could’ve embraced Post’s phony hero story
- Too good to be disbelieved: The military, myth, and Jessica Lynch
- Jessica Lynch one of ‘Time’ magazine’s ‘faces of the decade’
- ‘A debunker’s work is never done’
- Movies, and a myth, for the Fourth
- ‘Getting It Wrong’ goes on Q-and-A